Brad Pitt doesn’t give interviews often, and when he does, they tend to happen in strange and impromptu places. Like this poolhouse, on a property that belongs to neither of us, not too far outside Pasadena. By necessity and inclination, Pitt likes to present a moving target, and so he spends a lot of time passing through spaces like this one, spaces that are convenient to something else he’s doing and that once he leaves, he’ll likely never see again. He’s Brad Pitt, though: With him comes an atmosphere, his own weather, a heightened kind of reality that involves everyone in the vicinity looking directly at him until he’s gone. Despite that?or, maybe at this point, because of it?he’s learned to be comfortable, at ease, just about anywhere. Anyway, picture a room we’re both strangers to. That’s where Brad Pitt and I talk.
Just yesterday the Quentin Tarantino film Once Upon a Time?in Hollywood, which Pitt stars in opposite Leonardo DiCaprio, opened in New York and Los Angeles. Pitt was also watching the final cuts of a film called Ad Astra, directed by James Gray, that was due in theaters in September. All of a sudden, people were remembering the existence of Brad Pitt’the great movie star, maybe our greatest, in not one but two movies, reminding everyone just how good he is at this when he bothers to do it. Because he doesn’t actually act much anymore. He hasn’t made a big deal about this?just gradually receded into his own life and pursuits, which in the past few years have been turbulent and included a spectacularly public divorce. In Hollywood he’s increasingly become more of a producer and power broker, through his company Plan B Entertainment, than an onscreen presence.
When Pitt does act now, it’s often to help will a film into existence?appearing just often enough in The Big Short, or 12 Years a Slave, so that he can be cut into the trailer and waved in front of the movie’s financiers. But prior to this year, the last movie he actually starred in was the 2017 Netflix feature War Machine. Before that, 2016’s Allied. His last truly great lead performance, arguably, was in 2011’s Moneyball, a clinic in easy, weary ex-jock charisma that led to Pitt’s third and most recent Academy Award nomination as an actor.
So he was getting used to being out and in public?or, at least, semipublic?again. He tried to explain what it was like for him to try to move around outside of his home in Los Angeles. Whole cities sometimes feel practically off-limits to him, he said. New York, for example: ?It’s always been tough for me. Just the paparazzi. I can’t have freedom there. So without that?it takes the fun out of it.? His experience of daily life is in many ways so different from most people’s that he’s learned to strip conversations back down to their most basic and sturdy parts: How old are you? What do you do?
He’s 55 and an astronaut: gone places and seen things that most of us never will. And now, for the first time, he’s playing one in a movie. In Ad Astra, Pitt’s character is named Roy McBride. In the opening scenes of the film, he’s given a mission to travel from Earth into increasingly distant space in an attempt to find his beloved astronaut father (played by Tommy Lee Jones), who disappeared years ago and who may or may not be still alive.
Pitt made the movie with an old friend of his, the director James Gray, and both men will tell you that’though Ad Astra takes the form of an action film, complete with moon-set buggy chases and space-capsule shoot-outs?it’s really about the ideas and thoughts and fears that seize you as you roll into late middle age. Are we alone in this world? Can we ever be truly understood?or, for that matter, ever understand ourselves? ?Almost all of it is trying to figure out a way to express our emotional interior,? Gray told me. ?And almost none of it: ?I gotta get the gun.? It’s about trying to find a way to express something about loneliness. To get at something that we both understood and sometimes couldn’t even verbalize.?
In the film, Pitt’s McBride is isolated and almost pathologically repressed. McBride is also a celebrity’son of a famed explorer, recognized by everyone he meets. The parallels with Pitt himself were not lost on either man. ?One of the things that I found always very beautiful,? Gray said, ?is this idea that you could make a film about someone that outwardly you think has it all together but in fact is really battling inner demons. And I felt that Brad had always had that kind of?I don’t want to say anger, because anger has negative connotations?but danger in him, you know? And that kind of loneliness, which comes with the territory of who he is. And you use that.?
In the poolhouse, I asked Pitt if he found it difficult to play a character as alone as McBride is in Ad Astra.
?Well, it wasn’t for me,? Pitt said. He smiled. ?I don’t know what that says about me.?
?Leo and I were having this conversation the other day. I hit this point in the late ’90s or early 2000s, where I realized I was chasing these interesting [roles], yet I was failing to live as interesting a life as I thought I could.?
He’d already tried to lie down on the bed in the poolhouse, he told me, only to encounter an unsettlingly musty smell. ?You know those roadside motels, in the desert?? he said, gesturing at the bedspread. So he’d relocated to a wooden chair, and then he started leaning back in the chair, and then the chair started squeaking and almost gave way.
?I’m going down,? Pitt said, trying to regain his balance. I offered to switch.
Here he smiled the wolfish, rueful grin that he has been smiling in movies for more than 30 years now.
?Yes, you go down,? he said. Then laughed the wolfish, rueful laugh that he has been laughing in movies for more than 30 years now.
Perhaps because of how infrequently Pitt stars in a movie these days, it’s tempting to try to figure out what in Once Upon a Time? or Ad Astra drew him off the sidelines and back to acting. Pitt will acknowledge that these choices have become increasingly personal as his career has gone on. ?It’s been my question the last 15 years: ?If I’m gonna do the role, what can I bring to it that someone else can’t?? ?
How do you find the answer?
?Well, it’s about bringing my personal experience, my personal humor, my personal, um, embarrassments, and my personal pains. When I watch [Christian] Bale or [Tom] Hardy, I can’t do what they do. I love watching them. And I couldn’t step into that role.? But: ?I want to do the same thing on my end.?
Mostly, he said, he just says no to stuff. ?Leo and I were having this conversation the other day. I hit this point in the late ’90s or early 2000s, where I realized I was chasing these interesting [roles], yet I was failing to live as interesting a life as I thought I could.?
He didn’t say exactly when, or what movie, marked this transition, but you can ballpark it. It’s when he goes from the Pitt who was a ’90s cinema icon?chiseled, heartthrob-y, gravely standing at the center of whatever movie he was in’to the Pitt we know now, the one who is completely without hang-ups about being looked at, who is confident enough in his absurd beauty and charisma to do weird and character-actor-ish things with it. Watching Oprah with George Clooney and holding back tears (Ocean’s Thirteen). Making quiet, meta-textual statements about celebrity and manhood (The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford). Wrapping himself in spandex (Burn After Reading). Scalping Nazis (Inglourious Basterds). Chewing, snacking, fidgeting, snacking some more (all of them).
He paused, still thinking about why it was that he changed his attitude toward the work he was doing.
?Maybe it’s just getting older too, man.?
?It’s just getting fucking older!? he continued. ?How you become more aware of time, and you’ve had more experience, good and bad, with people. And your own wins and losses’the older you get, they don’t seem like so much of a win or so much of a loss. Who you spend your time with, how you spend time?it has just become much more important to me.?
He sculpts now. Listens to a lot of music. Does dad stuff. And he seems to watch a lot of movies, according to people who know him. Jeremy Kleiner, who is copresident, along with Dede Gardner, of Plan B, told me about a conversation he and Pitt recently had about the great Chilean director Pablo Larra?n, who is probably best known for his one English-language film, Jackie. But Pitt brought up a different movie, Kleiner said. ?He says: ?The Club. The Club is amazing. That scene where the guy is, like, yelling outside the house, you know?? And I was like, you saw that? It’s not like Pablo Larra?n’s more well-known film. It’s the least well known of his non-English-language movies. And he was drilling down on a specific scene. And that happens.? Kleiner described Pitt’s relationship to watching stuff as possessing ?intense curatorial hunger.? Anyway, that’s what Pitt does with his time now, mostly.
He said he still enjoyed acting, but he didn’t want to center his life around it anymore. He was done living through the movies, he said: ?There was just too much emphasis on finding interesting characters. I went, ?Fuck me, man. Live an interesting life and the rest will take care of itself.? Like, ?You go out and you?live an interesting life. Get out and have real experiences.? And that is what informs the work. Not going to find the interesting work and then trying to make it up. I just became more conscious of how I was living versus what I was living for.?
You, more so than many actors, seem comfortable with the pauses and the rhythm of not working.
?I’m very comfortable with that,? Pitt said, nodding.
?Everyone thinks they know him,? James Gray said. ?And yet they don’t know him at all. The whole truth is much?I don’t want to use the word ?darker,? but it’s not really only darker, but it’s much more mysterious.?
In Once Upon a Time?in Hollywood, Pitt plays a fading stuntman named Cliff Booth, doubling for a fading actor named Rick Dalton, played by DiCaprio. Cliff is the kind of character that Pitt plays better than any other living actor: charismatic, a little dangerous, stocked with a deep supply of grace note jokes that Pitt delivers with obvious glee. (?That was a smooth leap,? Cliff says to Rick as the two of them are slumped over beers, watching Rick jump out of a truck on television one night.) It’s obvious what Tarantino, who wrote the role Pitt played in 1993’s True Romance and first cast Pitt in 2009’s Inglourious Basterds, and who loves the movies more than he loves life itself, sees in Pitt. He sees a movie star, a guy who can hold a shot, or a throwaway line of dialogue, and make it feel sexy and immortal?instant film history.
Gray, with Ad Astra, is after a very different side of the same performer. ?I wanted almost to conjure a kind of ’60s idea of an astronaut, you know?? Gray told me. ?And this is going to be pretentious, but I had wanted to make something that was sort of the last dying dance, in a way, of an older world order. And to show in some sense how rotted it is.? This would be the Pitt of films like The Tree of Life: a paragon of increasingly obsolete manhood, in some amount of obvious pain, trapped inside himself.
I asked Pitt if he could feel the difference in the two roles: Do you think about that as an actor?how to maintain that connection to an audience for something like Ad Astra, when you’re not using classic-movie-star tools to do it?
?That’s a really good question. I don’t think about it in those terms. I think of prior performances that I’ve loved. I know they play. I don’t really know how they play. I don’t know how Anthony Hopkins does it in The Remains of the Day, or Gene Hackman in The Conversation. I don’t know why they work, I don’t know how they work. But I know they can work. I know they can fail.?
Pitt laughed quietly here.
?You know, there’s films we make for the populace. And I love those. If I have one film at the end of the day that I can watch, it’s gonna be a Will Ferrell. That’s where I want to go. But if I like the film, if I like the scene, if I feel something good about the scene, something truthful?I don’t mean ?like?; I can dislike, but if I know it’s quality?if I feel that way about the film at the end, I know someone else will. I can’t guarantee you it’ll be a mass audience or it’ll be a small audience, but I know. And I’ve always kind of operated that way. Meaning I know when it’s a bit smelly. You know? When it’s all said and done and it smells, I know.?
It may be hard for you to access this, but on some level, in the back of your mind, you have to know at this point that if a moviegoer’s coming to a movie with, like, a big Brad Pitt face on the poster, that there’s some preconception.
?Well, I always try to avoid that, having my face on the poster. I love movie posters. I think they can be much more interesting than selling a face. And if you look back, we’ve had some good ones. But I think what you’re talking about is tone, the tone of the film. Like, a Coen brothers’ tone is very specific. Tarantino’s very specific. And this film, in a more contemplative film, that’s a different tone.?
So you’re not worried about the person who’s like, ?I want to see the guy from Ocean’s Eleven.?
?No. Never. When I started out, I once heard a famous actor say that. It was something in the script, and the actor said, ?My audience wouldn’t let me do that.? I thought, ?This guy’s done.? And where’s the fun in that? I would be bored to tears.?
We talked about acting here, for a minute, how Pitt used to use all the tools that they teach actors. He would make animal noises, do tongue exercises. He had to teach himself how to become a good actor. But now, he said, ?I go by feeling. It’s more music. I really approach a lot of this like my love for music. I can feel the rhythm. I just trust in it.?
He said he didn’t really recognize the actors who talked about being consumed or haunted by the roles they played, ?like James Dean, he couldn’t let go of his character for three months after?I’m not that person. I don’t understand that.? Pitt leaves his characters behind the moment he finishes playing them. ?I’m off. Gone.?
Do you feel like you’re more pleased with your performances now than you used to be?
?That’s hard for me to judge. I know my feeling. I couldn’t watch and rate it. Because there’s a lot of other things tied to it. Like, where was I in my life at that week? What happened that day? And some I don’t even remember. So I couldn’t judge it that way. But I can judge it by feeling. Like, if I got lost in it?when the car just slips into gear and you’re cruising.?
Ad Astra looks like a film you got lost in.
?When you walk away from the scene, it’s great. Scenes are like rounds in a fight. You do all your preparation and you get ready, you get your gloves on, you walk to the ring, and it’s literally a walk. They’ll say, ?They’re ready for you on set.? And you walk to the ring and then the bell rings and you get those three minutes, and whatever happens, whatever punches you take, whatever you throw back, defines the scene. And it doesn’t always go the way you hope, but if you get to a place of truth, then you’ve won.?
I started asking about something else.
?By the way, while we’re on it,? Pitt said, gently returning to the subject. ?Something that always bugs me is when they say, ?Well, he’s an actor,? or ?She’s an actor, actress, actor.? Meaning the connotation is that you go and fake something. And acting is the exact opposite. I just want to get that on the record. It bugs the shit out of me.?
What he means there is: When you see Brad Pitt acting, that’s Brad Pitt finding his way into a real feeling. It is the opposite of whatever fa?ade he might go around wearing in life. He sometimes thinks that everyone, to some extent, is performing??you know, in our constructs of our personality that we present to others.? But all that ceases when he goes to work. What happens there is entirely real. ?I can’t speak for anyone else,? he said. ?But that’s what works for me, the kid from the Ozarks. I never studied at Juilliard. I don’t know.?
When Pitt talks now, it tends to be in a slightly elliptical way?he talks around himself, indirectly, rather than about himself in any real, concrete detail. But of course, he well knows that Brad Pitt is the text of practically every movie he’s been in and most of the conversations he’s had over the past 30 years. He’s learned to be genuine and sincere while guarding huge swaths of his life from public consumption. As with his character in Ad Astra, ?everyone thinks they know him,? Gray told me. ?And yet they don’t know him at all. The whole truth is much?I don’t want to use the word ?darker,? but it’s not really only darker, but it’s much more mysterious.?
Still, films like Ad Astra offer clues. Dede Gardner told me it is opaque, even to her, why Pitt chooses the films he does. But, she said, ?I think we’re all big believers in, you know, movies do talk back to you. And I think it was this movie, at this time in his life, being about what it is about.?
The movie went into production in 2017, almost a year after Pitt’s wife, Angelina Jolie, filed for divorce, part of a sequence of events that led to a custody battle over their children. It’s impossible to know how much any of this did or did not affect the work that ensued. But it’s safe to say it all left him in a philosophical mood.
In thinking about Ad Astra, Pitt said, he and Gray ‘talked early on about this premise of the inability to connect, which was the springboard for the piece. But now what? And how to start illustrating that? And then these other ideas started emerging around that. Then: What is connection??
The film was ultimately pretty, I think, optimistic about the possibility of connection. Where do you land on that question?
?Uh, I’m optimistic about the possibility. I’m very optimistic.?
Were you always?
?Oh, man, I’ve gone through everything. Like, I cling to religion. I grew up with Christianity. Always questioned it, but it worked at times. And then when I got on my own, I completely left it and I called myself agnostic. Tried a few spiritual things but didn’t feel right. Then I called myself an atheist for a while, just kind of being rebellious. I wasn’t really. But I kinda labeled myself that for a while. It felt punk rock enough. And then I found myself coming back around to just belief in?I hate to use the word spirituality, but just a belief in that we’re all connected.?
One theme in the film is that faith can often be a distraction from self, right?
?Yeah. Escape. A looking outward instead of looking inward. Looking beyond, not seeing what’s right in front of you.?
And maybe even deliberately using it for that purpose.
?No question. It’s more comfortable.?
In your own life, when you want to distract yourself from yourself, what are the alleys you use?is it acting, or??
?No, I always?I’m aware when I’m doing something in an obsessive way. Like, my friend right now, he’s just obsessed with watches, and he looks them up and studies them. And I know he’s avoiding something in his?in his domain.?
You’re saying when you do it, you know.
?Oh, yeah. I’m very aware. I could feel that from an early age. I knew I was avoiding something. But then once you’re aware of it, then what? I mean, the people I’m really drawn to, they just have no filter. They have no protection. They have no filter on their thoughts. They sometimes get in trouble because of that, but I adore them. I adore that they’re just so open and raw about their feelings at any moment.?
Is it possible that you feel that way because the way your life has developed, you don’t have the option of being that raw or unfiltered?
?Well, I think we’re drawn to what we are trying to change or improve in ourselves. I grew up in the Ozarks, and I’ve come to learn that we’re pioneer stock. We’re people who get things done. Don’t talk about much; get it done. And we don’t complain. Complaining is really looked down upon. And it’s not true. We’re always kind of ?Woe is me.? But this idea of if you get hurt, you break an arm, you cut yourself, you just deal with it. You don’t make a big fuss about it. And there’s a positive side to that that I appreciate. But it works the same way internally?what I’ve described as not taking inventory of yourself. How are you feeling at this moment? What’s really going on? We just don’t deal with it, and get on with it. And that, I’ve found a real hindrance.?
Not taking inventory.
Although taking inventory can lead to a dark place, too, right?
?Well, I guess in the beginning. I always feel a bit buoyant after, when I can recognize or I can discover. I don’t see it as one single epiphany. I see it as something you’re always circling. But it’s one of those orbits that, you know, you get close to it and then you’re really far away from it and then you’re winding it up and you’re getting close, until you hit the mark.?
The other big idea in Ad Astra, a film that takes the form of a son chasing after his father, is about the nature of fatherhood and legacy. What did our fathers leave to us, good or bad? What will we leave, in turn, to our children? Gray is a father of three; Pitt a father of six. Inevitably, as Ad Astra developed, they discussed this. ?James and I had been talking a lot about fatherhood, about manhood, the way we were raised, the way our fathers were raised, versus what we want to be for our kids,? Pitt told me, staring off into a corner of the poolhouse. ?You know, my dad always talked about?it was very important to him that he build a better path for us than was built for him. And he did it. So where do we go from here as men today??
You must think about this question, in terms of what you pass along: Are my children getting the best of myself or the worst of myself or do I have any control over it?
?It’s precisely that. Precisely that. Growing up, it was more about: You don’t show weakness, tears are for girls. And with that comes a loss of vulnerability, even a loss of taking inventory of how you feel?’that phrase again. ?All that is shuttered down. And the movie was designed for him to face a catalyst, where that old regime [of masculinity] doesn’t work anymore. And it’s gonna force him to crack himself open and become more complete. As a man. And I see that with us today.?
There was a version of Brad Pitt that once existed that was the strong, silent type: think of Tyler Durden, in Fight Club, haranguing Edward Norton for being soft and weak. That performance was ironic, not an endorsement. But it had an alpha quality to it that was all Pitt’strong and good-looking and completely without mercy. Blind to whatever flaws he might have. And, to some extent, he grew up that way. He had to learn to be a different kind of man, he said. ?Everything’s cyclical. It seems new to me, because coming from where I’m coming from and the movies I grew up on. But it seems to me that this idea of: There’s strength in vulnerability. It’s not a posing, strength of muscles, ?I can do anything? kind of blind confidence, but it’s a real confidence in really knowing yourself, your strengths, your weaknesses. And being really?vulnerable to and open with the people you encounter, the people you love. Being able to laugh at your foibles.?
Those are hard lessons. Is that a revelation that you came to easily?
?Oh, God, no.?
There was a stubbornly bright beam of light shining in from the corner of the glass door, and so Pitt stood again, grabbed a fluffy white bathrobe, and hung it over the top of the door. ?Look at that,? he said, gesturing at his handiwork with exaggerated pride. ?It’s solved.? In the softer light, his face appeared gentler, almost worn in. He ran his hands through his hair until it stood up on every side.
Pitt doesn’t make a big deal out of it, but he’s put a lot behind Ad Astra. His company is producing it; he is practically, for most of the film, the only actor in it. I asked how he will ultimately gauge its success.
?Well,? he said, ?for the financiers, whether it be studio or independent, that will be monetary. And most of our films, which I feel is a mistake, get defined by the opening weekend. They’ll say it’s a hit or it’s a miss. But all of my favorite films, I found them well after the fact.?
He paused a moment. ?I guess that doesn’t answer my fiduciary responsibility.?
Then said: ?But it does! Actually I disagree with that. Because I’m looking at the film: Does it have anything to say in 10 years or 20 years? Could it still have legs? Could it still be around? History is rife with films that we love today that were abysmal ?bombs? on their opening weekend. And we find them later, or we catch up with them.?
In 2007, Plan B put out The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford and A Mighty Heart. ?Neither of which, by the way, many people saw,? Dede Gardner said. ?And I’ve been trained, as I think most people in Hollywood are trained, to think that it was a failed year of releases, because not many people saw those films. And Brad said to us at the end of that year, ?I could not be prouder. And you watch: These movies are going to stand the test of time.? And I just sort of took this huge breath like, ?Oh, maybe we get to do this in a different way than it is normally done.? And it was totally thrilling and scary and also cool as fuck, you know??
Plan B, Pitt said, came out of this idea’that as studio-tentpole-type films started taking over Hollywood, people just weren’t making movies that might have a chance to be discovered by film lovers like Brad Pitt, later, down the line. ?There was this whole gap between $10 million and $70 million where films suddenly were having a really difficult time getting made,? Pitt said. ?And really difficult, talented voices, great storytellers that we had loved?we started supporting those. It wasn’t any design to be a successful production company. I had started developing my own stuff, so I might as well do those in-house. But that wasn’t the primary focus.?
Hollywood is a place where people hold tightly’maniacally’to whatever clout they have. But Pitt began lending his out to guys who really needed it, like Barry Jenkins, or James Gray, for that matter, whose The Lost City of Z was produced by Plan B. ?And I was in a very fortunate position at that time,? Pitt said, ?where I had that kind of power, where I could.?
I think you still have that power, right?
?Uh, yeah. I mean, somewhat. I mean, to some degree.?
Gardner told me that Pitt’s involvement in Plan B varies by the film. But, she said, ‘that’s never to say he doesn’t come in, watch cuts, give advice, suggest music and editors and actor ideas, you know? It varies relative to real life taking place. But I think the most important thing is that the culture and spirit of the company are very much born of him?of his mind-heart.?
Streaming and the further collapse of the studio system have muddied the water a bit in terms of the role Plan B and Pitt now play in the industry, Pitt said, for better?in terms of who was getting opportunities?and for worse too. ?I wonder about the future of film. I really do. There’s so much content out there, so much disposable content, that a lot can get lost.?
He said these days he felt like he was sometimes watching the movies he loved just vanish from the consciousness. ?I love a slow, contemplative film?I grew up on the drive-in and whatever movies we could see, and that’s where we had three television channels. So I look at youth today, and they absorb so much information and seem to like it more in quick bursts and don’t have necessarily the palate to sit two hours for a film. They would rather watch a series for a quick bit, and then they can follow another one if they want to or move on to something else. So I’m very curious. I’m no longer shocked now when I ask a 20-year-old, ?Have you seen The Godfather?? And they say no. ?Have you seen Cuckoo’s Nest?? No. And I wonder if they ever will. So that’s where I go, ?Ooh, is there a future to film? What will survive?? ?
For years now Pitt has had a go-to analogy when people ask him about fame. (People do this all the time.) He describes it ?as being that lone gazelle out on the plain. And the tigers, you know, they’re in there. They’re in the grass. And you’ve lost the herd. You’re not connected to the herd anymore. And it’s that. It is that loss of privacy. And being hunted.?
I’ve always loved this analogy. The honesty of it, the way that it?in its blunt mix of loneliness and fear and the feeling of being perpetually observed?captures what must be something close to the truth, without being particularly self-pitying or angry. He’s lost the herd. It is what it is.
I asked if he felt any kinship with the astronaut he played in Ad Astra: another guy split off from humankind, gone places that can only be rendered to the rest of us by way of fables and metaphors.
?Well, that makes it sound much more noble than it is,? Pitt said.
But it shares that quality of, no one really understands, and you can’t reliably bridge the gap.
?Until you see that other gazelle.? DiCaprio, maybe. He doesn’t say exactly.
But how many gazelles are there in this world, really? Like, five?
?Yeah. No, it’s odd.?
He was shaping up his hair again, running his fingers through it until it framed his face in a deeply familiar way. He looked like?Brad Pitt. There is only one of him.
?But it has its perks too,? he said.
CrazyGurl strives to bring you the latest & most entertaining news & pulp she can find. If you have an idea or would like to write us something click HERE